The pie chart shows the percentage of women in poverty and the bar chart shows poverty rates by sex and age. They are from the United States in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Contained in the pie chart provided is data pertaining to the proportion of poor females, while the bar chart demonstrates the rates of poverty by gender and age in America in 2008. Overall, females who were single with no dependent children made up the largest proportion of total, and the poverty rates in both gender illustrated a downward trend when they got older.

In regard to the pie chart, one sees a noteworthy gain in single females without dependent children. It is evident that the percentage of poor single females without children accounted considerably 54% of total, but the figure of single females who had children were only 8%. For married females, those who had children made up 12% which was 14% lower than the proportion of those with dependent children.

Turning to the bar chart, the poverty rate of females were higher than that of males in general. At the age range from under 5 to 17, there was nearly no difference between the poverty rates of males and females, since the figures of both genders were about 21% and 16% at the ages under 5 and 5-17, respectively. However, the gap became larger when they were from 18 to 34 and at the age range 75 and over in which the poverty rate of females was approximately 5% higher than that of males. Finally, the difference in both sexes' rates was moderate at the ages from 35 to 74, hovering around 2 to 3% .

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, while, in general, in regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64197530864 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44264250277 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485596707819 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.3631911275 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.333333333 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206963228034 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105339908629 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765656776051 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148396150703 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787251532297 0.0819641961636 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.