Contained in the four pie charts provided is data pertaining to differences in electricity generation in Germany and France from all kinds of sources and renewables in 2009.
Overall, the total output of electricity in Germany was 560 Billion kWh, which was 50 billion kWh higher than that in France.
With regard to all types of sources that used to produce electricity in two nations, one sees that the major sources were nuclear and conventional thermal. In Germany, it is evident that there was a remarkable gain of conventional thermal, which accounted 59,6%, while nuclear made up modestly 23% in total. In contrast, the most common electric generation source in France was nuclear since it gained overwhelmingly 76%, whereas conventional thermal was only 10,3%.
Turning to renewables, there were modest gain of this source in Germany and France, with figures of 17.4% and 13.7%, in that same order. Apparently, the percentages of biomass and wind in Germany were 39.3% and 36.9%, respectively, making them became the two most popular renewable sources in this country. However, biomass only made up a small proportion at 8.1% in France, and the proportion of wind was just 10.5%. Despite the fact that hydroelectric accounted moderately 17.7% in Germany, it was the primary renewable source to generate electricity in France as its percentage was 80.5%. In addition, it is clear that solar is rarely used for producing electricity due to its minuscule gain, 6.1% in Germany and 0,9% in France.
Finally, neither of two nations used geothermal for electricity production.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...lion kWh higher than that in France. In regards to all types of sources that used to produ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... nuclear made up modestly 23% in total. In contrast, the most common electric gene...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, finally, however, if, so, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20392156863 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86452805074 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541176470588 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 283.868780488 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5703423642 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.636363636 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 5.23603664747 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202734517052 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868771208773 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909553673257 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155180780125 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618365962524 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.