The two pie charts contain energy data consuming by Australian household as well as the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions caused by energy using.
Overall, inhabitants in Australia expense a large amount of energy in heating water which comes along with high greenhouse gas emissions. For cooling purpose, the data accounting for a very tiny level of the whole figures.
In the first chart, the percentage of energy using for heating application is by far the most prominent one, at just nearly 50%. To a lesser extent, water heating is another main purpose of energy consuming, with 30%. Other appliances is reported just a half of water heating figures. The remainders play a very small-scale figures, consuming just 13% collectively.
For the greenhouse gas emissions, water heating and other appliances are the main factors, causing 32% and 28% of gas amount respectively. The percentage of greenhouse gas resulted from heating and refrigeration are generally the same, approximately 15%. Cooling and lighting purposes is largely insignificant, leading 11% of emissions in total.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'figure'?
Suggestion: figure
... The remainders play a very small-scale figures, consuming just 13% collectively. For ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, well, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38596491228 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00967967484 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573099415205 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9291961932 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224905128394 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086865735538 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076954578006 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148398205051 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672803226066 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.