The number of people going for a walk daily has been diminishing steadily. Several accompanying reasons for this trend are determined and worth considering to come up with viable solutions which jeopardise its development and to stimulate more and more people walking.
People might feel demotivated to walk stems from two prominent reasons. Firstly, it is argued that people have plenty of work to do at the workplace which prevents them from having some spare moment. The only free-from-work period of time they have is night which is packed with dozens of personal routines so it is hardly surprising that walking is not their best choice. Secondly, many people consider walking as a tedious leisure activity. Other forms of recreation are favoured such as gym, fishing and so forth due to its evident results and benefits that justify taking up them while walking is just a bland exercise and is nothing but a waste of time.
Having seen such reasons, individuals and the government should try to promote walking by adopting some feasible approaches. Raising awareness about walking is one of the best options. For example, the authorities could conduct a workshop indicating some concerning health issues of a sedentary lifestyle and how they could be addressed by walking. Besides, some forms of incentives is a good idea for encouraging walking. To get the attention of people in walking, several sorts of marathons contests should be carried out, appealing to people by some prizes.
To sum up, while the reasons for walking issues are clearly seen, a promotion of walking should be made by some kinds of competitions coupled with a deep understanding of the benefits that walking could bring.
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 40
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking 61
- the bar chart below shows the number of research students studying a different subject in 2005
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'considering coming'.
Suggestion: considering coming
...for this trend are determined and worth considering to come up with viable solutions which jeopardi...
Line 2, column 225, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME
Message: Use simply 'period'.
...e spare moment. The only free-from-work period of time they have is night which is packed with...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08928571429 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73581452632 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592857142857 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.778413232 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.615384615 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244336787908 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913082708 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529237533358 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149347822622 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412370328365 0.056905535591 72% => OK
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.