Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis. What are the reasons and how to
encourage them to spend their time walking?
It is true that the number of people that walk everyday is decreasing. There are many factors that made jogging less favorable, but there are several ideas the government can put into action to encourage their people to spend more time to walk.
Firstly, there are a variety of public transportation that are very convenient, where some only need a decent amount of money to ride, such as buses and subway. Many people find it impossible to walk more frequently, since, for example in the United States, one state itself is too big and it can take an hour just to drive to work. Instead of spending hours to walk to a certain destinations, it also can save time for the users to do other tasks. Jog is a kind of exercises, which sweats are unavoidable. People would rather spend money on investing a car to drive to work than having their clothes soaking wet with sweat from walking.
In order to encourage people to walk more on a daily basis, the government should expand pavements. One of the reasons that Vietnamese people don’t walk regularly is because the motorbikes dominated the whole pavements for parking. Moreover, charge higher fees for car fuel and public transportation is another way to motivate citizens to jog.
In conclusion, there are many reasons that are discouraging people to walk, and making it less common. However, there are a variety of options that make people lessen on depending on cars, buses, and other transportation as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...rue that the number of people that walk everyday is decreasing. There are many factors t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'destination'?
Suggestion: destination
... of spending hours to walk to a certain destinations, it also can save time for the users to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66672571741 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575396825397 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0400564434 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27062528076 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102188399542 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762575548098 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17262708498 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423349347774 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.