The two pie charts show the structure of the energy consumption, as well as the greenhouse gas emissions for Australian household, based on the six areas of the energy usage.
Overall, it is noticeable that the largest amount of the energy in a household is consumed for the purpose of heating, whether it is living space or water. Additionally, significant discrepancy is noticeable between the relative contribution of the certain areas of the energy usage in the total household energy consumption and in the greenhouse gas emissions.
Water heating is responsible for 30% of total domestic energy consumption in Australia, and its contribution in the greenhouse gas emissions is roughly the same at 32%. Cooling, has the smallest relative contribution in both statistics, nevertheless its proportion is on the similar level in both data sets.
The most significant energy consumer in the average Australian home is heating, with 42% of the total consumption. However this area is responsible for just 15% of the greenhouse gas emissions. On the other hand, refrigeration, other appliances and lighting, use 7%, 15% and 4% of the total energy respectively, while at the same time they have roughly two times larger share in the domestic greenhouse gas emissions than in the firstly mentioned metric, or 14%, 28% and 8% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ing, with 42% of the total consumption. However this area is responsible for just 15% o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1132.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26511627907 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16110077972 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511627906977 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2804642899 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.5 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 5.23603664747 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260659643574 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115805865287 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080776964077 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171764131341 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836376760686 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.