With all the changes occurring in the world today, an important question is whether students should have a freedom of choice when ti comes to study subjects, or they should be directed to more practically oriented disciplines, especially science or technology.
Relative freedom of choice in the academy is what we currently have in most of the world. In my country, students are only limited by their previous academic results when choosing what to study. Although social and natural sciences are pretty much equally popular in Serbia, in my opinion, opportunities they provide are vastly different. An average graduate from a science and technology faculty can expect to acquire higher-paying job and a more rewarding career than their counterparts from social science departments.
Knowing this, it is not too difficult to understand why many people argue in favor of STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) programs. The importance of engineering, medicine or biology in the modern world is another good argument in favor of educating more students of this profile. Allocating less government-funded study places to programs that are considered to be less-needed, like maybe sociology or economics, and funding education of more engineers is a good way to balance out supply and demand in the labor market, and facilitate economic growth. This approach could work in a country like Serbia, where university education is predominantly state-owned, and companies are struggling to find qualified workers with STEM background.
However, completely abolishing certain study programs is, in my opinion, an extreme approach. Many students have a natural inclination towards humanities, and they should be enabled to study what they care about. Furthermore, treating social sciences as inferior and neglecting them can be a dangerous way forward for a society, because humanities provide a critical analysis of a broader context of our way of life.
In conclusion, although I tend to think that schooling more STEM students can be beneficial for a developing nation, in the long run, humanities are equally needed for a stabile society. Furthermore, I find that even considering any sort of ban on certain subjects is completely unacceptable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'freedom'.
Suggestion: freedom
...uestion is whether students should have a freedom of choice when ti comes to study subjec...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a broader context of our way of life. In conclusion, although I tend to think ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, in conclusion, sort of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4899713467 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11477001843 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587392550143 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.194496426 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.857142857 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243917850494 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736339323376 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074161518554 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134712253124 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707893886504 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.