The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which result from this energy use. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the amount of energy consumed in percentage and the greenhouse gas emission produced due to its usage by an average Australian household.
Overall, it is clear from the chart that maximum energy is consumed by heating processes and minimum used by cooling system. Additionally, the water heating system and some other appliances produced most greenhouse gas as compared to the cooling system of Australian household.
On the one hand, as observed in the first pie chart large percentage of energy (42%) was consumed by heating, followed by the water heater (30%). Furthermore, 15% and 7% energy was taken by other appliances and refrigeration respectively. However, minimum percentage of energy was utilized by the cooling system (2%) and lighting (4%) in average household.
On the other hand, as noted in the second pie chart the maximum toxic gas effect was emitted by the water heating system (32%). Focusing on other appliances, harmful gas was produced by 28% of it. Furthermore, 14% emission was produced by refrigeration. In contrast, 8% and 3% of toxic greenhouse gas was emitted by lighting and cooling system respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gy was utilized by the cooling system 2% and lighting 4% in average household. O...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, second, so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22162162162 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98203042883 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459459459459 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4043206996 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234405819479 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105449261302 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729419054882 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174584561802 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705641605173 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.