The flow chart illustrates the consequences of deforestation. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The flow chart highlights the severe impacts of deforestation in various aspects
In general, the main consequences of deforestation could be divided into four immediate effects, which ultimately lead to 2 major pernicious outcomes in the long term.
As can be observed from the chart, clear-cutting of forests results in heavy logging tools and equipment compress the soil with the aim of making it hard and baked. Because of that, rainwater runs off these soil without any difficulties and this is greatly attributed to devastating floods
At the same time, there are 3 other hazards resulted from deforestation namely reduced roots in the forests, increased risk of burning as well as less moisture was returned to the air. Interestingly, they all introduce pioneer species while the vegetation is reduce downgraded, which is reportedly responsible for the deterioration of biodiversity. To be specific, since there are merely a few roots remain, topsoil is less likely to be held in place and, therefore, soil erosion is inevitable. Concerning the climbed number of forest fires, which can be caused either accidentally or intentionally, it goes without saying that waste woods from logging is eliminated and so do the microorganisms relied on them. Last but not least is the decrease in the amount of moisture produced by plants. This phenomenon is synonymous with less precipitation and, consequently, droughts hit us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'reduced'.
Suggestion: reduced
...pioneer species while the vegetation is reduce downgraded, which is reportedly respons...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, therefore, well, while, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1208.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34513274336 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15157332791 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 106.607317073 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.690265486726 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.9611384445 43.030603864 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.0 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0993087464841 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361914789214 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552242872914 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0825323682252 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531564888085 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.