The flowchart shows the impact of deforestation. Summarize the information and present relevant facts, make comparisons where relevant
Information is provided as a flowchart that illustrates resulting circumstances due to clear cutting of forests. Four different deforestation impacts are further delineated as cascading events.
Overall, the process of deforestation is shown to result in two different scenarios, which are flooding and less biodiversity. The process illustrating how clear cutting of forests leads to flooding is disjoint from the other categories, which exhibit some cross-correlation.
Flooding results when logging machinery compacts the ground so that the soil is hardened and water can easily run off, leading to aforementioned floods. On the other hand, eradication of trees can lead to the following three scenarios: 1) top soil is loosened due to fewer roots, 2) elevated danger of fires and 3) less moisture emitted to the environment. Even though these scenarios are initially dissimilar, they all result in less biodiversity.
Scenario one results in top soil that has been eroded, degrading the vegetation as pioneer species infest the deforested site, which then impacts biodiversity negatively. Similarly, bush fires can lead to micro-organisms infestation, again diminishing biodiversity. Scenario three results in less rainfall and hence drier ground with the same outcome as scenario one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...top soil is loosened due to fewer roots, 2 elevated danger of fires and 3 less mo...
^^
Line 9, column 425, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re initially dissimilar, they all result in less biodiversity. Scenario one ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, similarly, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1113.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.796875 4.92477711251 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30974728391 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640625 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1650373335 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.3 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0336398559045 0.215688989381 16% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0169508841466 0.103423049105 16% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0292445449493 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0299934864258 0.15604864568 19% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420322254392 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 11.4140731707 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.