The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Differences in behaviour regarding transport choices is tabulated for a period spanning fifteen years from 1985 to 2000. The table shows the annual average distances in miles per person that have been travelled, categorised across eight transport modes.

Overall, the total average distance that were covered increased by nearly 50 per cent, where journeys by car account by far for the largest portion of this increase.

In more detail, it is observed that in 1985 the average mileage was 3,199 for travel by car, which had increased to an average of 4,806 miles by 2000. Other modes that showed similar substantial growth were travel by long distance bus, train and taxi as well as all other, non-specified modes of transport.

On the other hand, decreases can be observed for bicycles and walking, which, respectively, decreased from 51 and 255 in 1985 to 41 and 237 average miles in 2000. Contrary to the data for the long distance bus, the data for local bus usage also slumped from 429 to 274 miles.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, well, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94736842105 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51301458348 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637426900585 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.4401226166 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.857142857 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0851098677161 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419627294779 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0246651251929 0.0843802449381 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0525841028639 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302478651619 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.