The following is a diagram of mobile phone recycling process.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The flow diagram illustrates the sequential steps taken in the recycling of mobile phones.
Overall, it seems to be a complex process, involving many steps. However, at the end, most of the material is utilized in one way or the other, with a minimal wastage.
At first, the mobile phones, after being received from consumers, sent to storage and forwarding facility. From there, it is segregated into three groups, namely resalable components, handset and battery. The former group is directly put into sale, whereas the latter two goes into complex recycling process separately, yet the similar steps are followed for each one of them, including dismantling, mechanical and magnetic separation. After separation, the product obtained from both groups, collectively segregated into three types: metal parts and wiring board, plastics, and other materials.
Furthermore, the first type undergo complex processed of copper smelting and valuable metal refining before being reused, whereas the plastics are either reprocessed in order to make lower grade plastics or incinerated to obtain energy. No further processing is done for other materials.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61142857143 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75222210779 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685714285714 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 63.8905313799 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.111111111 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108067216381 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448837017492 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436664221278 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0740165370544 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043375517924 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.06136585366 128% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.