The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children’s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the details of annual income by various sources and expenditure of a charitable organization, working for children in USA. The units are measured in percentage.
Overall, the organization received a total of 53.56 million dollars approximately and spent about 53.22 million dollars in one year. The major portion of income contributed by donated food material followed by revenue generated by community participation, whereas, the predominant expenditure of this amount was in running the services.
To begin with, the donated edibles accounted for 86.6% of the total revenue generated, donations from the society was 10.4% of the total amounts followed by revenue generated from events that is 2.2% and minor contributions of 0.2% each from government grants and investments. Other minor contributions provided 0.4% of total income.
Furthermore, the revenue generated from above sources, was primarily utilized on running the services of child welfare, claiming for 95.8% of the total expenditure, In contrast, activities like organization of fundraising events and general management activities accounted for a minimal expenditure of 2.6% and 1.6% respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, so, whereas, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82954545455 4.92477711251 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18644144633 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596590909091 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 100.148053666 43.030603864 233% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 146.571428571 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0761362487841 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362436688443 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459528746788 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0519033948433 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457816531626 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 61.2550243902 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.83 11.4140731707 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.06136585366 125% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.