The given table and graph present an analysis of gross domestic product and employment sectors of a developing nation. The table depicts the distribution of employment and GDP in the year 2004, whereas the graph represents the GDP trends from the year 1998 to 2007 in terms of Services, Natural resources and Industry.
From the table, it is clear that there is no relation between employment and GDP of different divisions in 2004. Firstly, the employment is highest in Natural resources with 77.4 percent, whereas the GDP was highest in Services, particularly in Trade, Restaurants and Hotels with 37.4 percent. Secondly, the Government services occupy the second highest with 8.7 percent in employment while the Natural resources acquire this position in terms of GDP with approximately half the percentage of the majority. Adding to this, the entire services section provides 15.2 percent of the total of employment percentage while the remaining industry and Others sectors share an equal percentage of around 3.7 percent. Moreover, on the basis of GDP, The industry and Government divisions display a minimal difference in percentages with 15.4 and 12.5 respectively, exceeding the percentage of transport and communication services by around 6 percent. Finally, the least contribution is made by Transport and Communication services in employment and others section in GDP.
From the graph, it is easy to derive that the GDP of industry throughout the years is indirectly proportional to the Natural resources and Services. To begin with, It is worth noting that the Industry sector has maintained a consistent growth with no fluctuations in the time span between 1998 and 2007. In contrast, the GDP of services decreased at a constant rate from 1998 to the middle of 2002 without any significant changes. However, from 2003 the acceleration of decrement increased and resulted in a straight slope travelling downwards. Additionally, in the case of Natural resources, the GDP decreased gradually without any fluctuations from 1998 to 2004. But, it increased sharply in 2005 and decreased at the same rate by the end of 2006 and continued decreasing till 2007.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 33.7804878049 192% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 3.97073170732 479% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 965.302439024 184% => OK
No of words: 337.0 196.424390244 172% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26706231454 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96520990422 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 106.607317073 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477744807122 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.9 283.868780488 181% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6443754653 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.785714286 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139821874346 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582732438559 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669242234146 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121031070466 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849867640617 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 40.7170731707 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.