The given figure explains the design of modern landfills for household waste.
The given diagram details the construction of a landfill, which is created using modern techniques, and further explains its usage to treat the house waste.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the entire system is made up of an amalgamation of man-made and natural processes. It consists of rock, clay, pipes, and synthetic material. The process starts with digging a hole in the rock to end with the production of gas.
To begin with, the design involves a piece of rock, which is further carved out to form an empty hole. Then, the inner boundary is coated with a layer of clay before covering it with some synthetic material and a few pipes. Besides this, the design concludes after leaving some needed space for draining out the waste liquid through the drainage tank.
Turning to the usage, the waste directly from houses is trapped in the man-made hole, after which, the liquid waste seeps down into the rock via drainage tank. In the end, the whole system is sealed using some clay coating that later leads to the extraction of gases, followed by its storage in the fitted pipes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y its storage in the fitted pipes.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, look, so, then, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87046632124 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36053441863 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59585492228 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5275821591 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.444444444 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121580663166 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449041800457 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571072527358 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0741101024591 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521469968478 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.