The given line graph shows the past and projected figures on the government spending as a percentage of GDP for the years 2000 to 2025 in three areas.
The line graph presents data on government expenditure as a percentage of GDP on education, health and roads and railways from 2000 to 2015 with future projections for 2025.
In general, the government's past and future spendings as of GDP in the sphere of healthcare and roadworks show opposing trends with spending percentages in healthcare rising from the least to be the most.
In 2000, the percentage spending for education made up the highest of 5% , however, the proportion steadily declined to 4% by 2015 and it is likely remain constant just under at 4% by 2025.
Meanwhile, government expense on public wellbeing and roadworks was the same each making up 4% of Gross domestic in 2000. However, over the next fifteen years government increased its expenses on health to more than 6% and consequently, it is estimated to reach the highest of about 7.5% by 2025. By contrast, government spending for roads and railways showed a trough of 3% in 2010 before rising to under 4% in 2015. It is predicted that this percentage spending of GDP for roadworks is not going to change in the near future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... for education made up the highest of 5% , however, the proportion steadily declin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, well, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86243386243 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79968834831 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560846560847 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.3258880617 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.285714286 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39359413728 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169919190676 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772305248738 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233933601202 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609684335439 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.