The figures represent two underground car tunnels in Australia.
Overall, both tunnels are two-way, one passing under a river and the other beneath a street, with some more distinctions between the two.
The older tunnel which crosses the river is located underneath a bridge. The construction of this pathway began in 1986 and lasted for twelve years. While it cost 555 million dollars. Two significant features of the tunnel are its length of 2.2 kilometers and its height of 1.5 meters. The passage is separated from the river’s foundation by a body of sand and allows two cars to pass simultaneously in each direction.
The other tunnel differs in terms of width from the former and encompasses three lanes on each side. Another major difference of this tunnel is its expenditure equal to 1.1 billion dollars, almost twice that of the previous tunnel. However, the construction lasted far less, taking four years starting from 2002. The dimensions also alter, being 3.6 kilometers long and 2.5 meters high. A layer of stone and clay separates the pathway from the ground surface.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...an in 1986 and lasted for twelve years. While it cost 555 million dollars. Two signif...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09444444444 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65303809078 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672222222222 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3949694303 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.4166666667 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125229433341 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444978423574 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593058733641 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10337251722 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626373675468 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.65 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.