The popularity of cycling has been falling recently, despite its healthy and environmentally friendly nature. Although some reasons have led to this trend, it can be stopped by applying some measures.
The reduction in cycling in the past decades is resulted from several factors. First of all, people experience long commutes these days, especially in megacities, compared to the past that they mostly moved locally. Thus using cars is more beneficial in traveling long distances. In addition, lifestyles have changed and today, thanks to the development of cities, people are often too exhausted to ride a bike. As a result, they find driving more convenient than riding. Consequently, the construction of roads and highways will increase the danger of cycling for the ones who are still interested, and in the long-term they would tend to give up on biking.
Besides the concerning factors mentioned, some measures could be taken into account to encourage city dwellers into using bicycles. The first and foremost is the improvement of biking infrastructure. For instance, adding riding paths to the roads would enhance safety for cyclists, as well as allocating parking lots to the bikes in order to boost their security. Moreover, most cities have evaluation gains that enable cyclists to ride their bikes everywhere, tending to carry them on the subway or bus sometimes. Hence, considering appropriate practices towards this would be positive.
In conclusion, although various triggers lead citizens to avoid cycling, like the lack of suitable infrastructure, good steps can be taken to encourage them, such as parking and cycling lanes, combined with public transport acts.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40909090909 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86470839321 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670454545455 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5217948308 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189699688417 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584244748224 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616933846767 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122162116499 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083213317922 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.