The given pie charts provide information about the number of journal articles read per week by all students, undergraduates, and PhD students at a Canadian College in 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make co

Essay topics:

The given pie charts provide information about the number of journal articles read per week by all students, undergraduates, and PhD students at a Canadian College in 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.

The pie charts illustrate, the detail about, how many journal articles read by Canadian university students, undergraduates and PhD students in the year of 2015. Units are measured in percentage.

Overall, it has been clear from the chart that, the number of journal articles read by PhD students was the highest. Whereas, students and under graduates read the lowest number of articles in a week.

Looking at the details, students and undergraduates from Canadian college read an articles in a number of one to four was approximately, 65% and 75% respectively. While, 23% of students reported they were reading five to ten counts of articles in a week, which is 3% higher than under graduates with 20%. Similarly, undergraduates who were reading articles number above 11 was mere 5%, in turn, students account for about 12% in a week of 2015.

Regarding PhD students, spend more time and use higher number of journal articles in a week with 77%. However, the number of articles count with 5 to ten was around 12%. In comparison, only 5% of post graduate students was using less number of articles number of one to five over the given period.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an article' or simply 'articles'?
Suggestion: an article; articles
...dergraduates from Canadian college read an articles in a number of one to four was approxim...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% of students reported they were reading five to ten counts of articles in a week...
^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f articles in a week, which is 3% higher than under graduates with 20%. Similarly...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, regarding, similarly, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90769230769 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77108200231 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54358974359 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0569594453 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344295760023 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152424785369 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795544772563 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238213200146 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351874373819 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.