Government should spend more money on railways rather than roadways.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
I completely disagree with the notion; governments should only develop railways not roadways and will provide my supporting arguments throughout this passage.
Although, it's undeniable that railways have more advantages over roadways but sometimes roadways proved to be more beneficial for mankind. If a person encounters an emergency or serious health problem like heart attack or met with some kind of accidents, ambulance or car is the fastest way reach hospital or our destination rather waiting for train on station. Secondly, it's not possible to build a station for every destination. One might have to travel extra distance from station to reach his/her endpoint in that case if road navigation system isn’t appropriate mankind will suffer. Lastly, the younger generation can find it easy to use this mode of transportation but it is very difficult for elderly people to travel via rails. Aged people are generally weak and have little stamina and energy to walk. So, it can be quite challenging for them to first reach the station and then catch a train while it's much easier to travel via road because vehicles are available at our doorstep. Also, it is expensive to construct a railway line compared to roads and at the same time huge amount of electricity is required to power a railway engine
On the other hand, we shouldn’t forget services served by railways which are more economic and environment friendly. Railways can carry more than thousands of passengers at once which is the greatest advantage of it. Another is, it can cover long distances in lesser time compared to roadways. Thus, saves our precious time.
Based on the above discussion, I conclude that both modes of transportation are necessary for the development of a nation. So, it's foolishness to give more importance to only one.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 5.60731707317 446% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 965.302439024 157% => OK
No of words: 296.0 196.424390244 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11148648649 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80671275779 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 106.607317073 178% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641891891892 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 283.868780488 167% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 1.53170731707 588% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1544475904 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.071428571 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165262121452 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532181207841 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772171782911 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120122197595 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920278049117 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 40.7170731707 204% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 5.60731707317 446% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 965.302439024 157% => OK
No of words: 296.0 196.424390244 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11148648649 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80671275779 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 106.607317073 178% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641891891892 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 283.868780488 167% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 1.53170731707 588% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1544475904 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.071428571 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165262121452 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532181207841 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772171782911 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120122197595 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920278049117 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 40.7170731707 204% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.