The graph and chart below give information about species extinctions and the threats to plant life.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart below shows us the data of many species which are at the edge of being extincted, especially in the tropical forest and the bar chart shows the threats to vegetation caused from both human and nature.
Despite that there are only 4000 extinctions per millions in the years 2000s, it reaches 10000 in the 2020s, after 2 decades. Moreover, the number continues rising dramatically to 20000 in the next 20 years, which is as twice as the number of extinction in the earlier period. However, the number keeps going rapidly the following years, and peaks at 50000 in the 2060, within only 20 years. Fortunately, the number of creatures that is extincted stops growing, it decreases gradually in the next 4 decades, from 2060 to 2100.
The extinction of some individual sounds normal, but if it is in a huge number, that is a critical threat to biodiversity. Although human beings learn it by heart when we are a child, three-quarters<span class="hiddenSpellError"></span> of reasons lead to extinction is human impacts. The biggest percentage is 18.7%, caused by agriculture, and another noticeable percentage is 14.4% from harvesting. Plantation accounted for 4.7% and it is the smallest one. when it comes to natural impacts, the biggest is natural disasters, with the number 7 percent, and it only worth half of the second reasons by human impacts.
To conclude, in the tropical forest the next century will experience a noticeable change in the number of extinction of plant and animal species, and the biggest reasons for that is human impacts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The line chart below shows us the data of many species...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...ed for 4.7% and it is the smallest one. when it comes to natural impacts, the bigges...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 260.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08076923077 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.62937350944 2.65546596893 137% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4100638545 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.090909091 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0822142400274 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306564346304 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328022448426 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0566098839208 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029958039934 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.