The graph and chart give information about the migration to the UK between 2000 and 2008. The line graph shows the intended length of stay of immigrants. The pie chart shows the reasons for migration to the UK in 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
An investigation of the migration to the UK between 200 and 2008 was illustrated on a graph and a piechart. Figures are registered for different periods of time and reasons for migration to the UK (2000).
At first glance, it is readily seeable that the longest intended length of accommodating was up to 2 years. Along with that was the most favored reason for migration, stated working purpose.
Accordingly, in comparison to 5000 people stayed from 2 to 4 years and 52000 people settled 4 years onwards, 60000 immigrants chose to swell in the UK for up to 2 years at the beginning of the recorded time. 4-year-and-more migrants experienced rough oscillation during the course of time. Finally, their number remained unchanged. Meanwhile, 2-to-4-year migrants' pattern reached a plateau and encountered diminishment to approximately 40000. Unlike the other trends, the former line witnessed an overwhelming ascent and grew sixfold in 2008.
Furthermore, myriads of reasons for people to relocate to the UK were presented in the pie chart. The mostly accounted reason was working with a unique proportion of 38%. The following were studying purpose and accompanying family members, orderly. 7% of people visiting the UK for no or other reasons were the two final categories stated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: DURING_THE_COURSE_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'during'.
Suggestion: during
... migrants experienced rough oscillation during the course of time. Finally, their number remained un...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 282, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...derly. 7% of people visiting the UK for no or other reasons were the two final cat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, finally, first, furthermore, if, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1076.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19806763285 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06379995626 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618357487923 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3448310708 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7692307692 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9230769231 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257141622162 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818472006134 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883378630859 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156923460857 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111552612077 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.