The line graph and the table show the number of trips to other countries by UK residents for various purposes between 1989 and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
An investigation on the number of trips to other countries made by UK dwellers for various purposed was made between 1989 and 2001. The investigation was shown by a line graph and a table, whose figures registered for million of trips, 4 specific reasons and the total number of trips per annum.
At first glance, it is obvious that 1998 was a boom in the total number of trips with 73,5 millions travels made. Together with that, the majority of US citizens prefered to making their trips to travel on holidays during the course of time.
According to the graph and table, at the beginning of the period, 47 millions trips were made with 30 million of them went on holidays. Following are 9 millions on business, 5 millions on paying family visits and circa 3,5 millions on other reasons.1992 witnessed a slightly higher trend with 55,5 millions trips. Holidays continued to account for the major part and kept rising sharply when the other 3 purposes went through an ascending time. The same trend went on to 1993 with 68 millions trips, except for a noticeable drop in the amount of business trips and other causes. 3 years later, the total number of trips hit a high at nearly 74 millions, as well as 50 millions trips on holidays. Travels on family visits kept growing gradually, whereas categories going down in 1993 maintained their declines. Despite the growing trend, in 2001, figures encountered a descent to only 61 millions trips left. Only the quantity of trips paid for faimily joining escalated to 10 millions and more, meawhile all patterns undergone diminishment, include 19 millions trips on holidays, 9 million on business and 2 million on other reasons stated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-02 | Trần Thị Quỳnh Chi | 73 | view |
- The line graph and the table show the number of trips to other countries by UK residents for various purposes between 1989 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia Write a report for a university teacher describing the information shown 78
- The table below shows the percentage of water used in three sectors in six different countries in 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...d a table, whose figures registered for million of trips, 4 specific reasons and the to...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 216, Rule ID: DURING_THE_COURSE_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'during'.
Suggestion: during
...aking their trips to travel on holidays during the course of time. According to the graph and table...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, well, whereas, while, except for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 965.302439024 145% => OK
No of words: 288.0 196.424390244 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84375 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58780741226 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 106.607317073 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9462881513 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180622584143 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829566841436 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814578253935 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15758013921 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101710640425 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.