Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
The decision to continue or walk away has long been one of the hardest to make. There are myriads of arguments utilized to support both beliefs. Now, I am going to examine both views and then give my specific opinion on the light of the evidence.
On the one hand, people take side and choose to accept the disadvantageous circumstances. First off, acknowledging catastrophe means avoiding being overwhelmed by negativities. When facing such hardships, people tend to be vulnerable, depressed and exhausted. The longer the situation lasts, the more stressful they have to confront. Take one case for example, you experience deep frustration and tremendous unsatisfactory as your deadline due is coming near. If you keep up with the mood, not only will you fail but also undergo hazardous mental attacks. However, in this case, walking away can keep you from such mental torturing.
On the flip hand, some believe that trying to remedy the situation is a wiser move. Sometimes, detrimental events are actually golden chances getting to your life. The thing that matters the most is your choice to strive or stop and stand still. There is always room for improvement if people value the chances. For instance, an unemployment due to the COVID-19 turns his obstacle into a fortune and starts his own business as safe shipping service. Although facing hardship is depressing, but, as long as you seize the initial to grab the opportunity, things will change to a brighter vista.
From all the above-mentioned ideas, i support the latter one. From my perspective, the perception of going through obstacle deems to be an ideal one for me, as an adolescence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-09 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
| 2024-01-23 | hau le | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 56 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph and the table show the number of trips to other countries by UK residents for various purposes between 1989 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The table below shows the percentage of water used in three sectors in six different countries in 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- the diagram shows the process for canning pears Write a report of at least 150 words summarizing the main details and making comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 37, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...a. From all the above-mentioned ideas, i support the latter one. From my perspec...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, so, still, then, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01818181818 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88506900099 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654545454545 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.4358198986 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.6666666667 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2777777778 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18535150169 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486859230309 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451869631063 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905258532891 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354861346219 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.24 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.