The graph and pie chart below give information on in-house training courses in a large financial company.
The charts illustrate information of duration of training as well as an attitude of workers towards training. The spectacular feature of the chart is a paramount training provided to the technical staff.
As is observed from the pie chart, training of only technical staff that is 30 hours per year is equivalent to the training of other three courses namely career development, health and safety and interpersonal skills precisely 15, 5, 10 hours per year respectively.
Switching to the bar chart, the majority of secretary's take it as an integral part of the job while three-fourth managers take it seriously. However, half of the managers grab it as a good fro networking whereas little less than two-third of secretaries do not believe in networking. Moreover, 10-15% employees undertake it as a wastage of a precious time. On the flip side, 64-68% individuals regard it as a good excuse for a change.
All in all, it succors in the development of technical department and majority of workers also take it an a crucial part of their work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
... half of the managers grab it as a good fro networking whereas little less than two...
^^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'an' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: an; a
...nt and majority of workers also take it an a crucial part of their work.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, so, third, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98295454545 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02049964909 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607954545455 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5226857422 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.625 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138866312066 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545945749524 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062968302445 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083695512353 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761037784951 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.