The graph and table below give informatio about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The chart compares the amount of water consumption for agriculture, industrial and domestic in the world. Also the table illustrates the different water consumption between Brasil and Congo in 2000.
It is clear that the demands of using water increased dramatically from 1900 to 2000. We can also see that water consumption was considerably higher in Brazil than in the Congo.
In 1900, around 500 km3 of water was used for agriculture purpose worldwide. The figures for industrial and domestic water consumption stood at one fith of that amount. By 2000, one the one hand agriculture use reached at around 3000 km3, which was the highest number of all. On the other hand, the industrial and domestic use also rose significantly at approximately 1400 km3 and 500 km3 respectively.
By comparing the water consumption in Brasil and Congo in 2000, it is important to note that the water needs per person in Brasil, at 359 m3, was much more higher than that in Congo, at 8 m3, and this could be explained by the fact that Brasil had 265 times more irrginated land. Also the population of Brazil and Congo were 176 million and 5.2 million respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
..., industrial and domestic in the world. Also the table illustrates the different wat...
^^^^
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...r person in Brasil, at 359 m3, was much more higher than that in Congo, at 8 m3, and this c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...sil had 265 times more irrginated land. Also the population of Brazil and Congo were...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88324873096 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80208563177 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522842639594 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.6781262922 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218026974501 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108118849229 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06926320373 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162782565565 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068243908975 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.