The graph depicts how water is used all over the world in last century in three primary sectors, namely agriculture, industry and domestic usage and the table delineates the information on water consumption by Brazil and Congo in 2000.
Overall, while usage of water had increased manifold over the period in all three sectors, farming experienced the highest growth in last century. Also, in the year 2000, water consumption per person in two countries were directly proportionate to the population and available irrigation land in that particular country.
In 1900, water used for agricultural activities was approximately 500 cubic kilometre, whereas other two activities saw quite insignificant usage. Over the period, farming experienced substantial growth and it rose to about 3000 cubic kilometre in 2006. In contrast, industrial and household usage of water showed extremely diminutive increment till 1950, after that there was a slight rise in industrial usage whereas, previous trend continued for domestic usage of water till 1970. But their combined water usage was always much less than water used for agricultural activities.
Brazil being a country with 176 million people saw water consumption per person at 359 cubic metre, which was much higher than that of Congo, only 8 cubic metre. The data corroborated that water consumption per person is directly related to the population and area of irrigation land.
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Cambridge 6 test 1 task 1 91
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some organization believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 89
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features an 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilometre' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometres'.
Suggestion: kilometres
... activities was approximately 500 cubic kilometre, whereas other two activities saw quite...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilometre' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometres'.
Suggestion: kilometres
... growth and it rose to about 3000 cubic kilometre in 2006. In contrast, industrial and ho...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45291479821 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82731780932 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587443946188 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3427914674 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.111111111 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274938774654 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119230460678 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060710740578 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175222591529 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429176811228 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.