The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
While the table compares water consumption per person in Brazil and the Democratic Republic of Congo in 2000, the line chart shows global water used by three different sectors (km3) between 1900 and 2000.
Overall, the largest number of worldwide water was used for agriculture in 100 years. Besides, Brazil used more the amount of water than the Congo.
From 1900 to 1950, while the global water industrial and domestic use remained below 200km3, the water used for agriculture increased quickly from 500km3 to more than four times the amount of other sectors combined. In the last 50 years, water agriculture using continuously rose to reach a peak of 3000km3. During this time, the international water industrial and domestic use also went rapidly from nearly 200, 100km3 (1950) to around 1200 and 500km3 (2000), respectively.
In 2000, the population of Brazil and Congo were 176 and 5.2 million respectively. The water used per person in Brazil was 359m3 which was higher 40 times than in Congo, because of Brazil’s irrigated land was larger 265 times.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...griculture increased quickly from 500km3 to more than four times the amount of ot...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06857142857 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54548179153 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3769751341 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.875 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272901898436 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131181413 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687675235819 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180013135529 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693940354458 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.