The graph bellow shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in United Kingdom in 1970, 1990 and 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant
The pictorial depicts the different type of transportation facilities used to travel and return from workplace by the UK citizens in 1970, 1990 and 2000.
Overall, there was a considerable increased in the usage of cars as a medium of transportation in the given period. By contrast, the preference of biking as well as walking to the office dramatically declined in 1970 and 1990 onward.
First and foremost, car usage which stood at 10 percent in the initial period, gradually uplifted to approximately 4 times higher in the end of the given sequence, i.e. just beneath 40 percent of the average . Contrary, traveling by bikes and walking experienced a noticeable decreased over the year with about 33% of bikers and 35% walkers in 1990 onward. Nevertheless, the number of walking-workers somehow increased although slightly in 2000 to exactly 15 percent. Meanwhile, bikers continue to decline to reach just after 5 percent of the average. The other type of transport, bus, showed a fluctuation over the years. It started with 20% in 1970 to 25% in 1990 before it dropped to just the same as in 1990 in the last a decade respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
.... just beneath 40 percent of the average . Contrary, traveling by bikes and walkin...
^^
Line 5, column 748, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...1990 in the last a decade respectively.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96875 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03883249615 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598958333333 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.676563229 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159082787942 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663132970897 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724283494403 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135925241754 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838340639504 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.