The graph below compares changes in the both rates of China and the US between 1920 and 2000.
The line chart demonstrates the differences in the level of child-bearing in china and us.
Overall, china birth rate experienced many fluctuations including two major spikes, although this trend in us, in spite of some variations remained higher than china.
china and us birth rate trends followed a same path by 1930, then china saw its first spike at 15 in 1935. it suddenly plummeted down to 5 in 1940 and remained steady for 10 years, when we saw the second larger wave of birth in china at 20 at 1950. after that period the birth rate suddenly decreased sharply till 1955 and continue to decrease in downward trend.
On the other hand, us birth rate after 1935 developed a milder pattern than china. The data showed that after a sharp decrease in 1945 it goes up to 15 in 1950 but after that continue to decrease in a downward trend.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...level of child-bearing in china and us. Overall, china birth rate experienced ma...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... variations remained higher than china. china and us birth rate trends followed ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: China
...ons remained higher than china. china and us birth rate trends followed a sam...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...hina saw its first spike at 15 in 1935. it suddenly plummeted down to 5 in 1940 an...
^^
Line 9, column 250, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...r wave of birth in china at 20 at 1950. after that period the birth rate suddenly dec...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...continue to decrease in downward trend. On the other hand, us birth rate after 1...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, then, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 708.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68874172185 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4728693196 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615894039735 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 200.7 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5251276666 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.142857143 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167466871434 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915510501396 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605578535169 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114080913785 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205455040414 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.