The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web.
The given table provides the statistics of the frequency with which people go to recently developed websites, namely, Music Choice and Pop Parade. Overall, the latter seemed to be less popular within the first eleven days, and later the situation happened to change but only for a short period of time.
The competition was initiated with “Music Choice” winning by 80 thousand visits. According to the survey, twenty thousand less individuals searched for “Pop Parade” on the second day. The following 24 hours the site numbers reached index of 60.000 while the “Music Choice” figures remained constant. Thereafter, the favorite’s rate began to decline rapidly till the end of the week with a slight fluctuation on the 6Th day. Nonetheless, “Pop Parade” amount of visitors could not outnumber the opposite site and continued to be static till the 11Th day. After the fall the “Music Choice” figures leapt significantly and reached the peak of 150.000 visitors in 48 hours. The sudden surge of visits was followed by a dramatic decrease, which provided “Pop Parade” and opportunity to move into the lead with 120.000 viewers. The unexpected glory lasted 24 hours and on the 13Th day “Music Choice” numbers rocketed again. They reached its maximum of 170 thousand visits while “Pop Parade” stood behind with the index of almost 80.000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...happened to change but only for a short period of time. The competition was initiated with &...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 133, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun individuals is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ccording to the survey, twenty thousand less individuals searched for 'Pop Para...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nonetheless, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1203.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49315068493 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96910412833 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607305936073 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.2818976405 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.363636364 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0509598635786 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.024601197126 0.103423049105 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0252238264527 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0363147595297 0.15604864568 23% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00875959433877 0.0819641961636 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.