Some people prefer to plan activities for their free time very carefully. Others choose not to make any plans at all for their free time. Compare the benefits of planning free-time activities with the benefits of not making plans. Which do you prefer � planning or not planning for your leisure time? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your choice.
Since the beginning of civilization, the world society has wanted to plan activities for their free time very carefully. An opinion exists, that humans ought to schedule their performance accurately, whereas others consider that mankind should not take care of spare time. I personally believe that people must target their leisure time due to the reasons marked hereinafter.
First of all, thorough organization of the loose time helps people to receive maximum benefit from using that system. When humans glide their free time before, they do not spend much period to think about it, that is why their production possibilities is higher. Moreover, planning of the leisure time for pleasure is a true way of becoming successful almost everywhere. For instance, according to the “Russian millionaires today” web-site, most rich man thinks carefully about all part of rest and choose the best option. In other words, competent plans’ compilation assists mankind to build a prosperous career and receive an advantage from it.
However, some people do not agree with this opinion, as they consider, that the best way of spending leisure time is to take no action. Humans believe that outline drafting cannot give you the opportunity to do whatever you want in a particular moment. Furthermore, they think that planning your spare time is complicated idea and humans are not be able to take rest after creating it. For example, according to the “Leisure for Pleasure’’ newspaper, people, who don’t plan their rest at all are happier at least at 25% than organized and glide their time people. Thus, the absence of planning free time makes people more blissful and enervate.
I cannot agree to that point of view, as I am convinced, that proper regulation of the free time makes possible to achieve basic goals during the rest. Mankind hard to plan details for the leisure but overcoming a laziness from desire do not do anything uncover the opportunity of the most useful spare time. Rational and productive off combines with relaxing rest, that is why mankind receive a best of both worlds. For example, according to the “How to maintain yourself” student book, characters mix efficiency and relaxation showing tremendous final result. Hence, reconcilability and reasonableness of the plan is the crucial part of the free time, which helps humanity to reach purposes.
In conclusion I would like to say that thorough spare time organization is useful and required skill. Although some humans consider that do nothing is the best option of performing time, I cause doubt that opinion as planning helps to attain goals and obtain a maximum benefit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... is complicated idea and humans are not be able to take rest after creating it. Fo...
^^
Line 5, column 417, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...ating it. For example, according to the “Leisure for Pleasure’’ newspaper, people...
^
Line 7, column 395, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...axing rest, that is why mankind receive a best of both worlds. For example, accor...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, moreover, so, thus, whereas, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2241.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17551963048 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73278187842 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535796766744 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 692.1 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.8687069642 48.9658058833 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.05 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.65 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478853403796 0.236089414692 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144053013814 0.076458572812 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912602434426 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281733637412 0.150856017488 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649687812807 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.