Media surrounds us, from the shows we watch on television to the music we listen to on the radio.
How does media affect the society?
Do you agree that the impact of media has more disadvantages than benefits?
Modern technologies has contributed greatly in capability enhancement of the mass media creating favorable conditions for them to environ us. The means of communication own a huge potential of exerting an individual’s opinion about the crucial issues. I absolutely disagree to the point that the influence of TV, the Internet and radio sources is rather disruptive than auspicious for a permanent data consumer.
Mass media may influence the opinion about the burning questions starting from THE sociopolitical area finishing with THE pop culture. Such an impact may be disruptive as it prevents a person from shaping an independent point of view. However, individuals may also gain a plethora of new information due to the popularization of self-education via TV. For instance, according to the TASS, linguistic broadcasts on channel «Culture» has promoted a demand for foreign languages. Thus, the mass media possess many options of exerting their influence on people.
To my mind, the communications media’s effect on a permanent consumer is rather positive than negative. To start with, a wide variety of referral sources enables an individual to formulate a relatively detached opinion. Secondly, modern technologies allow to absorb sampled pieces of information which is significant in today’s pace of life. For example, according to Pavel Durov, Telegram has gained its popularity by virtue of capability to sort your own news line reducing the time on unwanted data. Thereby, to my way of thinking, the mass media own plenty of valuable features that outweigh any adverse peculiarities.
To sum up, media do exert influence on its users in many aspects commencing with molding opinion ending with apprising spotlight news. In spite of all THE drawbacks that accompany TV and the Internet, individuals reap more benefits than flaws from its utilizing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bout the burning questions starting from THE sociopolitical area finishing with T...
^^
Line 2, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...E sociopolitical area finishing with THE pop culture. Such an impact may be disru...
^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'absorbing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: absorbing
...on. Secondly, modern technologies allow to absorb sampled pieces of information which is ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... opinion ending with apprising spotlight news. In spite of all THE drawbacks that...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, in spite of, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43298969072 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13507548414 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625429553265 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.5681522964 49.4020404114 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.4 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152098582445 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504462105956 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450125981998 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974935579607 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207246894849 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.