The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption energy in the USA since 1980 with projection and with 2030 summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features
The line graph presents information about the amount of energy consumed by 6 types of fuels in the USA from 1980 to 2015 and the anticipated use handle 2030.
Overall, it is clear from the graph that the highest amount of energy was utilised by petrol and oil, whereas the least amount by hydropower. Noticeable point was in the beginning nuclear, solar and hydropower showed similar amount of usage.
The petrol and oil provided far higher energy than the other fuels at 35 quadrillion units in 1980, which increased in the following years and it will reach nearly 45 quadrillion units in 2030. The next one was natural gas at 20 units in 1980, while coal had the figure slightly less than the natural gas at around 15. The call will overcome the position of the natural gas by 2030 at 25 units whereas natural gas will still remain at initial rate.
the fuel namely nuclear solar and hydropower had the similar and negligibleusage at around 4 units in 1980 and they maintained almost similar units for following 10 years till 1990. After 1990, nuclear energy shared five units and it will maintain same figure at 2030. From2010, there was slight fluctuations in the amount of energy used by the solar and hydropower at around four and three units and projected rate is also same.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...less than the natural gas at around 15. The call will overcome the position of the ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...gas will still remain at initial rate. the fuel namely nuclear solar and hydropowe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71111111111 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40240209009 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5706367875 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.777777778 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112739913138 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595427456893 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710581841632 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989292266445 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875239542708 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.