The information about the consumption of energy in the USA from 1980 to 2030 with the projection from a 2008 report is depicted y the rendered line chart. The data has been calibrated in quadrillion units.
To begin with, 35 quadrillion units of energy used by petrol and oil in 1980. There was a fluctuate increase noticed in the usage of power until 2005, which was increased by 5 in 2005. However, after that, the utilization of energy increased dramatically and also this trend will continue in the future until 2030. Moreover, 20 and 15 Quadrillion units of energy were noticed in 1980 by Natural gas and coal respectively. Although there had been fluctuated increase noticed in the usage of power by coal and natural gas in 2010, it accounted for 22 and 23 correspondingly, then the usage of coal increased rapidly with the projection of 2030, it will be increased by 8. however, the utilization of energy by natural gas will stay similar in the estimated 2030.
Moving towards, in 1980, 3 quadrillion units of energy utilized for nuclear, solar and hydropower. Despite the usage of energy by nuclear and solar increased steadily until 2005, a drastic increase will be seen in the usage of energy by these two fuels with projections until 2030, it will be comprised for 6 and 5 respectively. There was a fluctuate decrease observed in the usage of energy by hydropower, it will be decreased by 1, which will be accounted for 3.
To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that the highest energy utilization was seen by petrol and oil and it will continue in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ed by petrol and oil in 1980. There was a fluctuate increase noticed in the usage of power ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 671, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ion of 2030, it will be increased by 8. however, the utilization of energy by natural g...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...sed for 6 and 5 respectively. There was a fluctuate decrease observed in the usage of energ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, then, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 275.0 196.424390244 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75636363636 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82347655112 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447272727273 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 408.6 283.868780488 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6334107249 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189319902899 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869898932056 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120907416234 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15385265058 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143339589354 0.0819641961636 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.