The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The Line graph provides information about the amount of energy utilized by US people since 1980 with the projection until 2030 according to a 2008 report. The units are measured in quadrillion.
Overall, the greatest quantity of used energy is petrol and oil. Coal and natural gas have the similar pattern until 2015. Then both are fluctuated in different way. Nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower also people have been using but least. However, the line graph shows same trend in the use of energy.
It can be seen that, the petrol and oil have the some fluctuations in the units, in the first fifteen year from 35q units to dropped to around 33q units beg a significant climb to approximately 47q units in 2030.
Similarly, after an unstable changing from 20q units, in 1980 to 25q units, in 2015. The figure of natural gas will stay stable until 2030. Whereas, coal had slow increase from 15q to less than 20q units between 1980 and 1990. Further more, in 1995, it had a sharp peak considerably more than 20q units. Moreover, this usage will have reached just over 30q units until 2030. In addition, US people have been consuming nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower energy but less than 10 quadrillion units throughout the period. However, according to a 2008 report, use of petrol and oil is highest, coal and natural gas in average, nuclear, solar/wind and hydropwer use is least.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
... seen that, the petrol and oil have the some fluctuations in the units, in the first...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, then, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87341772152 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5027891294 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552742616034 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.4286416631 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223992088815 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726171378773 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119253729631 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171464608814 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166908599303 0.0819641961636 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.