The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The given line graph depicts the history of U.S. energy consumption from 1980 to 2008, date of the report, and the prospective trend deduced from then to 2030.
Renewable energy sources have experienced a slight increase in utilisation since the ‘80s, and it is not projected a significant uptrend. Nuclear energy, solar/wind and water power have been the least used resources, around 4 quadrillion units each of the three types. It is observed however a slow increase in nuclear and solar/wind power consumption (of almost 1.5 quadrillion units more each of them for 2030) but hydropower use expectations are to remain the same.
On the other hand, after a short descent during the firsts 80s, petrol and coal suffered a steady rose in use, along with natural gas. Nevertheless, petrol and oil are the most extended source of energy, and the tendency indicates that it will remain the same for the next 20 years. In a different way, natural gas will maintain stable around 20 quadrillion units per year from now onwards.
In general, the chart shows a predominant consumption of no renewable sources of energy, although apparently, we will see an increment in the use of nuclear, solar and wind energy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-01 | Rashila | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | trangh16688 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Sagar Gurung | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | Leeinho | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for you 47
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 84
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... remain the same for the next 20 years. In a different way, natural gas will maintain stable aroun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0297029703 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75185191318 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628712871287 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.8467875173 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 5.23603664747 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164809197905 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727856625059 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102654521368 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117176190347 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124793070264 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.