The Graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with Projection Until 2030.

The chart illustrates the amount of energy being used in the United States from 1980 to 2008, and it was predicted for until 2030, based on a finding that was reported in 2008.

Overall, fossil fuels were the most consumed sources of energy in the country, with oil having the highest usage, followed by coal and natural gas. All three fossil fuels were expected to rise by 2030. Clean energy was the least used sources of energy but it was expected to rise at a slower rate by 2030.

According to the finding, petrol and oil had been dominating the energy shares in the United States with 35 quadrillion units being consumed in 1980. Although this energy fuel experienced ups and downs, it gradually increased up to approximately 48 quadrillions by 2030. In the early '80s, coal consumption was catching up against natural gas to become the second most consumed energy fuel, starting from more than 15 quadrillions in 1980. It has then been rising steadily over the period and was projected to rise double by 2030. The consumption of natural gas had fluctuated since the '80s until it reached about 25 quadrillions in the 2010s. This trend remains constant at the same rate until 2030.

Alternative energy sources are the least consumed fuels in the country. Less than five quadrillion units of each of these fuels were being used in 1980. Nuclear energy started to increase gradually but slowly and it was expected to increase up to 8 quadrillions by 2030, while solar is also increasing despite few fluctuations and approximately six quadrillions of solar consumption was predicted for 2030. Among all the energy fuel usage in the US, hydropower was being consumed the least as from 2010 until 2030, it remains consistent at the same figure as for 1980.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second, so, well, while, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 965.302439024 141% => OK
No of words: 277.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90252707581 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75308099497 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509025270758 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.0 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 0.482926829268 1657% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.2111102563 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.888888889 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7777777778 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186581330487 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849878784463 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627336241375 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108709224005 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638254941549 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.