The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The graph provides information about the expenditure of energy by fuel in America since 1980 and predictions towards 2030.
Overall, petrol and oil and coal showed a steady but significant rise throughout the period. Despite fluctuations, natural gas, nuclear and solar and wind energy consumptions experienced a gradually increase, whereas hydropower showed a downward trend.
In 1980, the energy consumption rates of petrol and oil were 35q and had some fluctuations and hit a low to about 33q from 1985 to 1995. In the following year, both fuels increased sharply and predict it will hit the highest point about 50q in 2030. Meanwhile, coal and natural gas initially were at 15q and 20q, respectively. The rate of natural gas fluctuated from 1985 to 2015, while coal increased sharply throughout the period, exceeding the natural gas’ rate in 2015 and will continue to rise to about 29q in the year 2030.
In early 1980, the rates of three remaining energies were at about 4q. A moderate increased in nuclear energy about 6q in 2005 and remained steady in 2015 and will rise to the highest point around 6q in 2030. In the meantime, solar and wind and hydropower energy experienced some fluctuations to almost 4.5q, and 2q in 2015, respectively, and will remain steady to 2030.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gradually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...nd wind energy consumptions experienced a gradually increase, whereas hydropower showed a downward t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06046511628 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76834458601 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493023255814 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1068572691 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.8 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212268704153 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968594612784 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866856571993 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156639622663 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961333658761 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.