The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The given illustration shows static information about the expenditure of energy by fuel in the USA between 1980 to 2012 and predicted to 2030.
As can be seen, petrol and oil are the primary fuel energy resource in the USA over the period with 35 quadrillion units in 1980 and rising to 42q in 2012. Despite some fluctuations from 1980 to 1994, there was a steady increase in 1995 and expected to continue to reach 47q in 2030.
The consumption of coal and natural gas almost had the same amount over the period. From 20q and 15q respectively in 1980, gas showed a small fall and coal a gradual increased, with the two fuels equal between 1985 and 1990. There were fluctuations between the two fuel energy sources since 1990 to 2016. The experts predicted the coal will increase to 45q, while natural gas will remain stable to 23q in 2030.
Furthermore, in 1980, fuel energy source nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower were equal at 3q. Nuclear had risen to 6q, and solar/wind to 4q, whereas hydropower had fallen back to the 1980 figure in 2010. It is expected to maintain this level until 2030, while others will slightly increase in 2030.
In conclusion, the US will continue to rely on fossil fuels with sustainable in the future, whereas the other energy sources remaining as small portions in the industry.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so, whereas, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81222707424 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52964724737 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545851528384 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0886362749 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.181818182 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236822687445 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897094840617 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547371414049 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136987376186 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585459867737 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.