The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about energy consumption in the USA since 1980, with projections until 2030.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the fuel consumption of the US since 1980 and the projected use in 2030 in a report in 2008.
Overall, the quadrillion units of petrol and oil were the largest in 1980 and will continue to rank first in 2030 with the biggest rise. Except for hydropower units that are projected to plateau in 2030, the consumption of other fuels will experience a rise. Throughout five decades, nuclear, solar and natural gas projected consumption will increase gradually, whereas the consumption of petrol and coal are forecasted to rise significantly.
In 1980, the consumption of petrol and oil were at the first place with 35 quadrillion units, surpassing that of coal by nearly half. The natural gas consumption ranked second with 20 units, four times more than that of the least consumed fuels such as nuclear, solar and hydropower (under 5%). From 1980 to 2008, nuclear power was the only fuel that experienced a gradual increase. While the consumption of coal, natural gas and petrol fluctuated, the two remaining fuels only showed a mild fluctuation.
From 2010 to 2025, the consumption of nuclear, wind, hydropower and natural gas is forecasted to remain static. However, the units of petrol and coal are expected to surge significantly. Until 2030, the consumption of petrol and oil is projected to reach a peak of approximately 50 quadrillion units and secure its first place. The consumption of coal will nearly surpass that of the previous second-ranked natural gas with a projected gap of 5. The remaining fuels that used to rank last are predicted to divide their rankings, with hydropower taking the last place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s that are projected to plateau in 2030, the consumption of other fuels will expe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, whereas, while, except for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 271.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0405904059 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87049296309 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457564575646 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.0 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7827110179 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.076923077 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173619271706 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792837187472 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744010804231 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155901781719 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0934602762825 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.