The graph below show the different mode of transport used to travel to and from work in 1960, 1980 and 2000.
The given bar graph represent information about various modes of transport used by passengers in years: 1960, 1980, 2000 respectively. The data is calibrated in per-centum. It is clear and coherent representation.
Overall, it is evident that; in 1960, plethora of people used bus, but in 2000 cars were the first choice. Furthermore, in 1980 train and bus. On other hand, car and tube show equal proportion
It can be seen, by comparing train and car as a transport facility in three different years.it is depicted that, in 1960 train was highly used by people about 18% while, car was only 15%. In addition to this, in year 1980; availability of train is 5% more than car. Furthermore, during 2000, car was at its highest peak represent approximate 38% as compare to train that is 22% only.
As far as trend was concerned, by comparing transport facility such as: tube and bus it seems that people give more priority to bus than tube. Its percentage was shown in bar graph 38%, 28% respectively. Moreover, in 1980 and 2000 bus was used 8 percent more than tube, but in 2000 tube preference reached at 25% while, bus was only 15% used by people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74257425743 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70597881386 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574257425743 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.5087326045 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0909090909 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225219610179 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870428666773 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884022999762 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158609041242 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610569912638 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.