The graph below shows the acid level from consumption of sugar , honey.eating sweet produce acid in the mouth which can tooth decay
The given tabular chart illustrates the information about through that which tooth because by acid level of mouth from consumption as sugar, honey.the of acid level calibrated by low pH values.
Overall, it is evident that either the of acidity maximum to cane sugar or minimum amount of honey.
To begin with,this all the process depends upon acid level of mouth from consumption of three sugars, fruit sugar, cane sugar, honey. In first fruit sugar is data of acidity 5 to 35. Although, these would be stable at 25 point. Moreover, In cane sugar are data amount 5 to 40 but this is stable at 15, 30Respectivily
On other hand, In third sugar is presence in between of these two sugars. Afterthat, In honey sugar have data amount differ from others. As well as, these have been data ratio 6 to 40 but this is achieved well possion at 25 . Afterthat, all this process of tooth decay when PH level incline, and tooth not decay when PH level is decreased.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , this
...inimum amount of honey. To begin with,this all the process depends upon acid level...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 184, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...fruit sugar is data of acidity 5 to 35. Although, these would be stable at 25 point. Mor...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 224, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... but this is achieved well possion at 25 . Afterthat, all this process of tooth de...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, third, well, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64705882353 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43524950168 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564705882353 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.689492364 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7777777778 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366605277694 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154578255059 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125640563945 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242169983306 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961032624952 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.