The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000
The line graph gives information about the amount of electricity made from three different types of raw materials in order to supply the city of New York from 1980 to 2000.
Overall, it is clear that the petroleum was the main source to produce electricity for New York in the 1980-2000 period. Besides, while the figures for the natural gas and the petroleum had sharply increasing trends, that of the coal underwent a decreasing trend.
At the starting point in 1980, the amount of electricity manufactured from the petrol was approximately 350 million kW hours, which was higher than those of the natural gas and the coal, at only precisely 100 and roughly 220 kW hours, respectively. After dramatic increases in 1985, the figures of both the petroleum and the coal significantly dropped to 350 and exactly 200 million kW hours.
In 2000, the figure for the petroleum rapidly grew up to over 700 kW hours, compared to 500 kW hours of the natural gas. In contrast, the amount of electricity made from the coal consistently decreased to nearly 190 kWh in 2000.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8306010929 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72078472748 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4802180291 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.285714286 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28216767725 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143900284272 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153492030086 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198178498636 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140909211926 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.