The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005.
The graph illustrates the number of books spent the amount of money in 4 different countries (Germany, France, Italy, and Austria ) over the examined period from 1995 to 2005. It is clearly can be seen that all of 4 nations experienced an upward trend for 10 years.
Looking at the graph in more detail, German tends to prefer to read books, in 1995, the sum of money spent on books in Germany was the highest, accounting for 80 million dollars while the opposite was true for that of Austria at 30 billion dollars. In 1999, the figures for Germany witness a slight increase to 90 billion dollars. before slowly decreasing to 85 billion dollars. Meanwhile, that of Austria remained stable at 40 billion dollars in 2001. There was a significant growth to 90 billion dollars and 70 billion dollars in the figures for Germany and Austria, respectively.
As can be seen in the graph, starting at 55 billion dollars in 1995, the figure for France did slightly go on at 75 billion dollars after 10 years. That of Italy saw a fluctuation before wanting on 55 billion dollars in 2005.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ries Germany, France, Italy, and Austria over the examined period from 1995 to 20...
^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Before
... slight increase to 90 billion dollars. before slowly decreasing to 85 billion dollars...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... slight increase to 90 billion dollars. before slowly decreasing to 85 billion dollars...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70526315789 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52113503876 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542105263158 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4825423087 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223986604069 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948112418623 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0979989975114 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164115272435 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558931071262 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.