The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graph illustrates the number of wasted products made by company A, company B, and company C over the period of time from 2000 to 2015.
Overall, it is clear that the figure for the waste made by company C increased in 15 years. Meanwhile, the number of the waste made by company A and company B generally decreased.
There was a slight decrease in the waste produced by company from 12 tonnes in 2000 to approximately 8 tonnes in 2015. Moreover, the number of the waste made by company B slightly increased from about 8 tonnes in 2000 to just about 10 tonnes in 2005. However, starting in 2005, it was rocketted to 3 tonnes of waste in 2015.
At the same period of 15 years, the account for the wasted products which were made by company C significantly rose from just under 4 tonnes in 2000 to approximately 10 tonnes in 2015. Moreover, the rise between 2005 and 2010 is a slow increase due to a ton rise during 5 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ny A, company B, and company C over the period of time from 2000 to 2015. Overall, it is clea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 763.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.38505747126 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56523424674 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454022988506 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4145227339 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.375 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156795372534 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890937934926 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575837397146 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124916907432 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536774831994 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.49 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.