The belowed mention line chart illustrates the comparison of three companies which wasting produced between 2000 and 2015.
It is clear that, at the start of the period, by 2000 the amount of waste output of company A was 12 tonnes, the figure for company B and company C were lower at about 8 tonnes and 4 tonnes respectively. Over the following of 5 years, in 2005, while company A decreased slowly of waste material from 12 tonnes to 10 tonnes, company B and company C increased slightly around 2 tonnes.
Moreover, for a period of 10 years between 2005 and 2015, company B which waste output dropped drastically by roughly 3 tonnes, and company A tend to fell steady waste produced by 7 tonnes. Meanwhile, the figure for company A rose gradually in waste production of approximately 4 tonnes from 2005 to 2015. By 2015, company A as well as company B decreased waste produced to 8 and 3 tonnes respectively. By contrast, company C’s waste output had risen to 10 tonnes.
There were significant changes in the amount of waste produced of three companies over a period of 15 years. While company A and company B saw waste material gone down over the period, company C increased considerably.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
... the figure for company B and company C were lower at about 8 tonnes and 4 tonnes re...
^^^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ically by roughly 3 tonnes, and company A tend to fell steady waste produced by 7 tonn...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71904761905 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7788519465 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452380952381 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7812240196 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.111111111 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413750024286 0.215688989381 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.223509428373 0.103423049105 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113647119189 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296784576822 0.15604864568 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106224853105 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.