The line chart illustrates the percentage of old people aged 65 or more in three different countries over a period of 100 years.
At the start of the period, the proportion of elderly who had aged 65 or over in the USA at about 9%, the figure for Japan and Swedish was lower around 7% and 5% respectively. In the following 40 years, there was a slight increase in the percentage of old people in American and Swedish by around 15% in 1980, while it is stable for proportion elderly in Japan from 1940 to the early 2000s.
The percentage of older who was 65 years old or more tend to unchanged between 1980 to 2000 in the USA. It is expected that inhabitants aged 65 or over reach in three different countries during the 20 years remaining, especially Japan is predicted rise drastically at more than 25% by 2040, the figure for American and Swedish are expected will increase to 23% and 25% respectively at the end of the period.
Overall, the chart saw that the proportion of older tends to increased for all three nations from 1940 to 2040, and Japan is expected to see the most dramatic changes in its elderly populations.
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views a 56
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live think and behave However some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life To what extent do you agree or disagr 84
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant You should write at lea 67
- The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50731707317 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59563537925 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492682926829 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.4345059386 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.0 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.1666666667 22.9334400587 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189734830201 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104727881846 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481431320758 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127212363898 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325303170953 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.35 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.47 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.