The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
The line graph compares how much refuse was produced by companies A, B, and C from 2000 to 2015.
Overall, there was a decrease in the amount of waste released by companies A and B, while the figure for company C saw a gradual increase. In addition, company B generally had the highest amount of sewage until being surpassed by company C in the 2010s.
About 12 tonnes of waste was produced by company A in 2000, with a subsequent decrease to roughly 11 tonnes of waste in 2007. Conversely, the amount of waste produced by company B started at the south of 9 tonnes, after which it experienced a rise to around 10 tonnes of waste in 2005, before declining to precisely 9 tonnes of waste in 2007. The figure for company C saw some similarities compared to company B, doubling from the north of 3 tonnes to approximately 6 tonnes of waste in 2007.
The amount of dust discharged by company C surpassed the figures of companies A and B in 2010 and 2015 to become the company having the highest amount of waste, followed by a constant increase to its peak (around 10 tonnes of waste) at the end of the period examined. Opposite changes can be seen in the figures for companies A and B, which experienced an annual decline to theirs low (8 and 3 tonnes of waste respectively).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...proximately 6 tonnes of waste in 2007. The amount of dust discharged by company...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44017094017 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69728545397 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457264957265 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.6460765395 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.875 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.25 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280607629578 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147973611459 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405360555588 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185425273879 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237521056905 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.