The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The line graph aims to compare the utilization of 6 different energy in the USA from 1980 with conjectures until 2030.
Overall, there were a general increase and a rise projection in the consumption of solar/wind, nuclear, natural gas, petrol and oil, and coal while the exhaustion of hydropower saw a decrease. In addition, the depletion of petrol and oil consistently had the highest figure and is expected to have the highest consumption in the future.
About 35 quadrillion units of petrol and oil, and 15 quadrillion units of coal were consumed in 1980, with subsequent growths to approximately 45 and 25 quadrillion units respectively in 2020, and final anticipation to 50 and 30 quadrillion units in 2030. The figures for nuclear and solar/wind were at just under 5 quadrillion units, followed by stability at 5 quadrillion units before being predicted to end the period at around 7 and 6 quadrillion units.
The consumption of natural gas started at 20 quadrillion units, after which it experienced a fluctuation in the range from 16 to 23 quadrillion units, before being expected to remain unchanged at 25 quadrillion units. The figure for hydropower saw similar changes, starting at the shy of 5 quadrillion units, hovering around 3 and 5 quadrillion units before being forecasted to level off at 3 quadrillion units.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 218, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...main unchanged at 25 quadrillion units. The figure for hydropower saw similar chang...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09132420091 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16180289716 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511415525114 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.1963341091 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.285714286 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2857142857 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114929941485 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795448983546 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114676038484 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121224118726 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134860775618 0.0819641961636 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.